Nicole Stansbury

Clinical Development

Avoiding 3 Common Pitfalls to Efficient Site Selection

Selecting the right sites for a clinical trial is one of the most important determinants of successful clinical trial recruitment. In an increasingly competitive clinical trial environment where study designs have become more complex and sites are more selective about the studies they take on, sponsors and CROs are tasked with making the site selection…

Clinical Development

The Ascendance of Site Managers to Meet the Dynamic Needs of Clinical Research

The increasing complexity of clinical trials requires a re-assessment of the functions of site management and monitoring. Both roles have traditionally been the purview of clinical research associates (CRAs), who have typically spent 60%-80% of their time on monitoring and only 20%-40% on site management. Traditionally, CRAs have a range of monitoring and site management…

Clinical Development

7 Reasons to Ditch Traditional Monitoring in Favor of a Centralized Strategy

Centralized monitoring’s state-of-the-art approaches and tools are reshaping clinical trials’ efficiency, accuracy, and overall effectiveness. Here we discuss the core methodologies that underpin centralized monitoring—study-level and patient-level data analysis—and how these strategies collaboratively refine the monitoring process. Moreover, we outline seven compelling reasons why shifting from traditional monitoring to a sophisticated, centralized approach is not…

Clinical Development

Data at Your Fingertips: The Case for Centralized Monitoring

In the dynamic arena of clinical trials, optimizing efficiency, maintaining cost-effectiveness, and safeguarding the integrity of collected data are important considerations. Traditional onsite monitoring has long been the cornerstone of ensuring data accuracy and patient safety. However, as technology and data analytics advance, a more efficient and effective approach has emerged—centralized monitoring. In this blog,…